|
KMID : 0861420120160020156
|
|
Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
2012 Volume.16 No. 2 p.156 ~ p.161
|
|
|
How about IRMA Curve
|
|
Chang Hyun-Yeong
Shin Sun-Young
Lee Hyun-Ju
Woo Jae-Ryong
Lee Ho-Young
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: IRMA method for the experimental reagents, as set out in the manual settings for doing and reporting the test results should, in principle. But many of the reagents allows for the setting of the plot does not have a lot of information. Depending on the angle setting of the table make a difference in test results and what settings are best suited to investigate.
Materials and Methods:The hospital has Boramae DREAM10, Cobra, SR-300’s using the Immunotech TSH reagents have been compared with the measurements. Since then there using EXCEL calculation of the equipment compared with the measurement.
Results:In the comparison between each piece of equipment 1.SR-300: DREAM 10 y = 1.1376x - 0.046 (LOG-LOGIT), 2.SR-300: COBRA y = 1.0985x + 0.042 (LOG-LOG) 3.DREAM10: COBRA y = 0.965x + 0.0887 (LOG-LOG) was the result. In all charts the same X, Y axis, X values were good in general when you have. Linear-Logit value of Cobra Dream10 and Excel tends to match the calculated values provided.
Conclusion:Is to guide the B / max, B / Total Logit Y axis of the chart is set to draw a look at the value equation when the X-axis LOG a high concentration are disadvantages rising urgently toward the slope. Linear-Logit plots close to the straight line has a curve. If you have a chart to guide on setting AS setting and therefore, set to guide the absence of information on the need to set up the experiment are thought to pass through.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
IRMA, Curve, Excel, Gamma Counter
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|